Bhutan (2009)

Bhutan, 2009
Principal Investigator
Nor Tshering Lepcha
Trainer
BR Shamanna
Sample size
4100
Response rate
98.7%
RAAB version
RAAB5
Diabetic retinopathy
No
Disability module
No

Survey comparison

Vision impairment

Prevalence (age-sex adjusted)

Female
Male
Total
Extrapolated magnitude
%
95% CI
Extrapolated magnitude
%
95% CI
Extrapolated magnitude
%
95% CI
Blind
683
1.6
1.0 - 2.2
634
1.3
0.8 - 1.9
1318
1.5
1.1 - 1.9
Severe
614
1.4
0.9 - 2.0
431
0.9
0.4 - 1.4
1044
1.2
0.8 - 1.5
Moderate
2329
5.4
4.3 - 6.6
2085
4.4
3.1 - 5.7
4414
4.9
3.9 - 5.9

Cataract

Cataract surgical coverage (CSC) (age-sex adjusted)

Female
Male
Total
%
95% CI
%
95% CI
%
95% CI
<3/60
-
62.7
49.9 - 75.5
-
74.2
63.4 - 63.4
-
68.6
61.0 - 76.3
<6/60
-
46.2
34.6 - 57.8
-
63.8
52.0 - 75.7
-
54.9
46.3 - 63.5
<6/18
-
29.6
20.9 - 38.3
-
43.2
34.0 - 52.5
-
36.3
29.1 - 43.4

Unmet need for cataract surgery: magnitude & prevalence (age-sex adjusted)

Female
Male
Total
Extrapolated magnitude
%
95% CI
Extrapolated magnitude
%
95% CI
Extrapolated magnitude
%
95% CI
<3/60
469
1.1
0.6 - 1.6
346
0.7
0.3 - 1.1
816
0.9
0.6 - 1.2
<6/60
939
2.2
1.5 - 2.9
612
1.3
0.7 - 1.9
1550
1.7
1.3 - 2.2
<6/18
2092
4.9
3.7 - 6.0
1606
3.4
2.4 - 4.4
3698
4.1
3.3 - 4.9

Notes

Vision impairment categories defined according to WHO thresholds using presenting visual acuity in the better eye.

All prevalence and coverage estimates are adjusted to the age and gender distribution of the population 50 years and older in the survey area.

All 95% confidence intervals adjusted to account for the cluster design of the survey.

Effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC) and cataract surgical coverage (CSC) are calculated according to the 2022 definition; eCSC is only reported where 6/12 data available.

Refractive error results, including effective refractive error coverage (eREC), only reported where 6/12 data available. RAAB6 surveys measured presenting visual acuity (not uncorrected visual acuity) so the alternative calculation for eREC is used.